Relationship between Big Five model parameters and indicators of psychological well-being in patients with borderline personality disorder

 

Authors

 

Kuftyak E.V.

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Russian Academy of National Economy

and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation”, Moscow, Russian Federation

Kozlov M.Yu.

SBIH “Psychiatric Clinical Hospital No. 4 named after P.B. Gannushkin” of the Moscow Department of Health, Moscow, Russian Federation

Ivanitskaya E.D.

SBIH “Psychiatric Clinical Hospital No. 4 named after P.B. Gannushkin” of the Moscow Department of Health, Moscow, Russian Federation

Emelyanov R.V.

SBIH “Psychiatric Clinical Hospital No. 4 named after P.B. Gannushkin” of the Moscow Department of Health, Moscow, Russian Federation

 

https://doi.org/10.26617/1810-3111-2023-3(120)-87-94

 

Journal: Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2023; 3 (120):  87-94.

 

Abstract

Background. In current psychiatric practice, there is an increase in the proportion of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and its frequent comorbidity with depression, PTSD, and substance use; this determines the interest of clinicians and psychologists in the biological and psychosocial reasons for the formation of BPD, typological features of the course and prognosis of development and outcome of the disease. Objective: to study the relationship between the Big Five model parameters and indicators of psychological well-being in patients suffering from borderline personality disorder. Materials and Methods. The sample (n=44) consisted of patients diagnosed with BPD. Inclusion criteria: absence of pronounced current affective and psychotic symptoms, sufficient level of intellectual development and logical thinking, absence of other mental pathology. A semi-structured interview was used to collect socio-demographic data and pathopsychological testing (assessment of behavioral characteristics). Psychodiagnostic methods: Russian version of the TIPI questionnaire (TIPI-RU), psychological well-being questionnaire by K. Riff (1989). The results obtained were analyzed using the Jamovi Program. Results. Statistically significant linear relationships have been established between the Big Five factors and indicators of psychological well-being. A significant contribution of extraversion to all indicators of psychological well-being was revealed. The contribution of emotional stability and conscientiousness to most indicators of psychological well-being, with the exception of autonomy and personal growth, has been determined. Multiple regression models were built, the predictors of which were the “Big Five” factors (extroversion, friendliness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness to experience), the criteria were indicators of psychological well-being (autonomy, competence, personal growth, positive attitude, life goals and self-acceptance). In patients with BPD, a statistically significant relationship was found between extraversion, emotional stability and psychological well-being. The pronounced influence of extraversion (focus on the outside world, friendly attitude towards others, sociability, energy, activity, openness, adaptability) on the psychological well-being of patients with BPD is consistent with the emotional cascade model (the relationship between BPD symptoms and dysregulated behavior), postulating that that behavioral disorders are provoked by a dysfunctional way of perception and thinking, which is associated with a decrease in awareness of external social signals. It is advisable to use an increase in the parameters of emotional stability, extraversion, and partly conscientiousness as a criterion for improving the level of psychological well-being during individual psychological and psychotherapeutic support for patients with BPD. The main target is psychocorrection of emotional-behavioral response and cognitive rigidity, minimization of internal tension, stabilization of the image of Self.

 

Keywords: borderline personality disorder, psychological well-being, Big Five assessment model, emotional cascade theory, psychocorrection.

 

Article (pdf)

 

Contacts

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Materials  

For citation: Kuftyak E.V., Kozlov M.Yu., Ivanitskaya E.D., Emelyanov R.V. Relationship between Big Five model parameters and indicators of psychological well-being in patients with borderline personality disorder. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry.2023; 3 (120): 87-94. https://doi.org/10.26617/1810-3111-2023-3(120)-87-94

 

REFERENCES

  1. Jowett S, Karatzias T, Shevlin M, Albert I. Differentiating symptom profiles of ICD-11 PTSD, complex PTSD, and borderline personality disorder: A latent class analysis in a multiply traumatized sample. Personal Disord. 2020 Jan;11(1):36-45. doi: 10.1037/per0000346. Epub 2019 Jul 1. PMID: 31259603.
  2. Morey LC, Zanarini MC. Borderline personality: traits and disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Nov;109(4):733-7. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.109.4.733. PMID: 11195998.
  3. Steyn R, Ndofirepi TM. Structural validity and measurement invariance of the short version of the Big Five Inventory (BFI-10) in selected countries. Cogent Psychology. 2022;9(1):1-17. 10.1080/23311908.2022.2095035.
  4. Wright AG, Pincus AL, Lenzenweger MF. Modeling stability and change in borderline personality disorder symptoms using the revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales-Big Five (IASR-B5). J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):501-13. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.513288. PMID: 20954052; PMCID: PMC3928984.
  5. Álvarez-Tomás I, Ruiz J, Guilera G, Bados A. Long-term clinical and functional course of borderline personality disorder: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;56:75-83. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.10.010. Epub 2018 Dec 24. PMID: 30599336.
  6. Streit F, Witt SH, Awasthi S, Foo JC, Jungkunz M, Frank J, Colodro-Conde L, Hindley G, Smeland OB, Maslahati T, Schwarze CE, Dahmen N, Schott BH, Kleindienst N, Hartmann A, Giegling I, Zillich L, Sirignano L, Poisel E, Chen CH, Nöthen MM, Mobascher A, Rujescu D, Lieb K, Roepke S, Schmahl C, Bohus M, Ripke S, Rietschel M, Andreassen OA. Borderline personality disorder and the big five: molecular genetic analyses indicate shared genetic architecture with neuroticism and openness. Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 11;12(1):153. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01912-2. PMID: 35411043; PMCID: PMC9001677.
  7. Skoglund C, Tiger A, Rück C, Petrovic P, Asherson P, Hellner C, Mataix-Cols D, Kuja-Halkola R. Familial risk and heritability of diagnosed borderline personality disorder: a register study of the Swedish population. Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;26(3):999-1008. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0442-0. Epub 2019 Jun 3. PMID: 31160693; PMCID: PMC7910208.
  8. Dukalski B, Suslow T, Egloff B, Kersting A, Donges US. Implicit and explicit self-concept of neuroticism in borderline personality disorder. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;73(3):159-168. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2019.1582694. Epub 2019 Mar 21. PMID: 30896322.
  9. Distel MA, Trull TJ, Willemsen G, Vink JM, Derom CA, Lynskey M, Martin NG, Boomsma DI. The five-factor model of personality and borderline personality disorder: a genetic analysis of comorbidity. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Dec 15;66(12):1131-8. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.07.017. Epub 2009 Sep 12. PMID: 19748081.
  10. Sergeeva AS, Kirillov BA, Dzhumagulova AF. Translation and adaptation of the Brief Five-Factor Personality Inventory (TIPI-RU): assessment of convergent validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Experimental Psychology. 2016;9(3):138-154. doi:10.17759/exppsy.2016090311 (in Russian).
  11. Shevelenkova TD, Fesenko TP. Psychological well-being of the individual. Psychological Diagnostics. 2005;3:95-121 (in Russian).
  12. Panos PT, Jackson JW, Hasan O, Panos A. Meta-analysis and systematic review assessing the efficacy of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT). Res Soc Work Pract. 2014 Mar;24(2):213-223. doi: 10.1177/1049731513503047. Epub 2013 Sep 19. PMID: 30853773; PMCID: PMC6405261.
  13. Cloitre M, Garvert DW, Weiss B, Carlson EB, Bryant RA. Distinguishing PTSD, complex PTSD, and borderline personality disorder: A latent class analysis. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2014 Sep 15;5. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.25097. PMID: 25279111; PMCID: PMC4165723.
  14. Kellogg SH, Young JE. Schema therapy for borderline personality disorder. J Clin Psychol. 2006 Apr;62(4):445-58. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20240. PMID: 16470629.
  15. Cavicchioli M, Maffei C. Rumination as a widespread emotion-based cognitive vulnerability in borderline personality disorder: A meta-analytic review. J Clin Psychol. 2022 Jun;78(6):989-1008. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23281. Epub 2021 Nov 24. PMID: 34816435.
  16. Sharp C, Michonski J, Steinberg L, Fowler JC, Frueh BC, Oldham JM. An investigation of differential item functioning across gender of BPD criteria. J Abnorm Psychol. 2014 Feb;123(1):231-6. doi: 10.1037/a0035637. PMID: 24661173.
  17. Streit F, Witt SH, Awasthi S, Foo JC, Jungkunz M, Frank J, Colodro-Conde L, Hindley G, Smeland OB, Maslahati T, Schwarze CE, Dahmen N, Schott BH, Kleindienst N, Hartmann A, Giegling I, Zillich L, Sirignano L, Poisel E, Chen CH, Nöthen MM, Mobascher A, Rujescu D, Lieb K, Roepke S, Schmahl C, Bohus M, Ripke S, Rietschel M, Andreassen OA. Borderline personality disorder and the big five: molecular genetic analyses indicate shared genetic architecture with neuroticism and openness. Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 11;12(1):153. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01912-2. PMID: 35411043; PMCID: PMC9001677.