Deterioration of mental health due to digital addiction (based on the survey findings from a student sample)

 

Authors

 

B.B. Balbarov

T.V. Raeva

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Tyumen State Medical University”

of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Tyumen, Russian Federation

 

https://doi.org/10.26617/1810-3111-2025-3(128)-17-24

 

Journal: Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2025; 3 (128):  17-24.

 

Abstract

Background. In the information and communication era, digital technologies are increasingly used across all areas of activity. While they serve as valuable tools for educational resources and drivers of development, researchers have also noted several negative effects. These include digital and gaming addiction, physical health issues (such as vision deterioration, sleep disorders, and muscle pain), voluntary social isolation evoking the risk of students’ maladjustment, depression, anxiety, stress, reduction in cognitive functioning and self-esteem. Objective: to examine the relationship between screen time and the severity of psychopathological symptoms, the risk of addiction, mental health deterioration, and reduced social activity. Materials. The study used data from a combined methodological approach involving cluster correlation analysis, and cross-sectional data from a non-random sample of student youth (n=324). The average age of the participants was 19.4 years (SD=1.3), with females representing 68.4% and males 31.6%. Methods. Mental state was assessed through psychiatric interviews. Psychometric tools included the standardized personality test (SMIL) which evaluates stable personality traits, behavioral patterns, emotional difficulties, and personality issues, and the SCL-90 symptom checklist which measures the severity of psychopathological symptoms. Data were also collected on participants’ past and current use of digital devices particularly in the context of problematic internet use. The data obtained were analyzed using correlation and comparative analyses. Results.Out of 509 participants, 324 completed all stages of the study. About 33% of participants directly linked mental health problems with interaction with the digital environment, but their severity did not fully correspond to generally accepted criteria for addiction. Statistically significant relationships (p<0.001) were found between screen time and the severity of psychopathological symptoms, the risk of addiction, mental health deterioration, and decreased social activity. The study suggests that digital environments do not inherently create pathological personality traits in students. Rather, such traits are largely formed during childhood and adolescence ‒ before the average age at which students began using digital technologies (around 9.01 years). These early traits are shaped by real-world environmental influences and are layered upon a constitutional personality core. Therefore, the emergence or worsening of psychopathological symptoms appears to be secondary to pre-existing vulnerabilities. Students with personality disharmonies are more likely to misuse digital technologies. The digital environment serves as an easily accessible channel for traumatic impact targeting the most vulnerable aspects of the personality. The psycho-emotional reaction often involves using digital media as a way to avoid discomfort or tension, which in turn may worsen existing psychopathological symptoms (e.g., post-traumatic stress responses). Conclusion. As digital device use continues to begin at younger ages, professionals in psychiatry, psychology, and psychotherapy will increasingly need to investigate the biological, psychological, and social factors that shape the mental health of individuals raised in a digital world. This research will be essential for understanding both the positive and negative impacts of digital environments on personality development and overall mental health.

 

Keywords: digital environment, screen time, mental health, personality imbalance, digital history

 

Article (pdf)

 

Contacts

 

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Materials  

For citation: Balbarov B.B., Raeva T.V. Deterioration of mental health due to digital addiction (based on the survey findings from a student sample). Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry.2025; 3 (128): 17-24. https://doi.org/10.26617/1810-3111-2025-3(128)-17-24

 

REFERENCES

  1. Digital Detox – 2023: On using the Internet and taking a break from it [Electronic Resource]. All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center (in Russian).
  2. Erikson EG. Childhood and Society: trans. from English. St. Petersburg: Lenato, AST, University Book Foundation; 1996:592 (in Russian).
  3. Chung S, Lee J, Lee HK. Personal factors, internet characteristics, and environmental factors contributing to adolescent internet addiction: A public health perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 21;16(23):4635. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234635. PMID: 31766527; PMCID: PMC6926822.
  4. Nikolaeva EI, Isachenkova ML. Features of the use of gadgets by children under four years of age according to their parents. Comprehensive Studies of Childhood.2022;4(1):32-53. https://doi.org/10.33910/2687-0223 2022-4-1-32-53(in Russian).
  5. Gautam P, Khanal G, Shrestha KB, Sapkota S. Internet addiction prevalence and associated factors among secondary-level private school students in urban Nepal: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 9;14(11):e083967. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083967. PMID: 39521473; PMCID: PMC11551995.
  6. El Asam A, Samara M, Terry P. Problematic internet use and mental health among British children and adolescents. Addict Behav. 2019 Mar;90:428-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Sep 11. PMID: 30579146.
  7. McCain JL, Campbell WK. Narcissism and social media use: A meta-analytic review. Psychol Pop Media Cult. 2018;7(3):308-327. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000137.
  8. Twenge JM, Konrath S, Foster JD, Campbell WK, Bushman BJ. Further evidence of an increase in narcissism among college students. J Pers. 2008;76(4): 919-928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00509.x.
  9. Ward AF, Duke K, Gneezy A, Bos MW. Brain drain: The mere presence of one’s own smartphone reduces available cognitive capacity. J Assoc Consum Res. 2017 Apr; 2(2): 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462.
  10. Liebherr M, Schubert P, Antons S, Montag C, Brand M. Smartphones and attention, curse or blessing? - A review on the effects of smartphone usage on attention, inhibition, and working memory. Comput. Hum. Behav. Rep. 2020. Jan-Jul;1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100005.
  11. Kurugodiyavar MD, Sushma HR, Godbole M, Nekar MS. Impact of smartphone use on quality of sleep among medical students. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2018;5(1):101-109. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20175604.
  12. Kim S, Favotto L, Halladay J, Wang L, Boyle MH, Georgiades K. Differential associations between passive and active forms of screen time and adolescent mood and anxiety disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;55(11):1469-1478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-020-01833-9. Epub 2020 Feb 13. PMID: 32055896.
  13. Xue Y, Xue B, Zheng X, Shi L, Liang P, Xiao S, Dong F, Zhang J, Chen Y, Liu Y, Qin Z, Zhang C. Associations between internet addiction and psychological problems among adolescents: description and possible explanations. Front Psychol. 2023 May 15;14:1097331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1097331. PMID: 37255516; PMCID: PMC10226521.
  14. LichkoAE. Psychopathies and accentuations of personality traits in adolescents. St. Petersburg: Piter, 2020:304 (in Russian).
  15. Sobchik LN. Standardized multifactorial method of personality research SMIL. St. Petersburg: Rech, 2000:219(in Russian).
  16. Derogatis LR, Cleary PA. Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL‐90: A study in construct validation. J Clin Psychol. 1977;33(4):981-989. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(197710)33:4<981::AID-JCLP2270330412>3.0.CO;2-0.
  17. Monroe SM, Simons AD. Diathesis-stress theories in the context of life stress research: implications for the depressive disorders. Psychol Bull. 1991 Nov;110(3):406-25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.406. PMID: 1758917.
  18. Masaeli N, Farhadi H. Prevalence of Internet-based addictive behaviors during COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Addict Dis. 2021 Oct-Dec;39(4):468-488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2021.1895962. Epub 2021 Mar 22. PMID: 33749537.
  19. Ивановский Б.Г. Преимущества и риски потребления в цифровую эпоху. Социальныеновацииисоциальныенауки. 2021. № 3 (5). С. 7-25. Ivanovsky BG. Benefits and risks of consumption in the digital age. Social Innovations and Social Sciences. 2021;3(5):7-25. https://doi.org/10.31249/snsn/2021.03.01 (in Russian).
  20. Orben A, Przybylski AK. The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Feb;3(2):173-182. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0506-1. Epub 2019 Jan 14. PMID: 30944443.
  21. George MJ, Odgers CL. Seven fears and the science of how mobile technologies may be influencing adolescents in the digital age. PerspectPsycholSci. 2015;10(6):832-851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615596788.
  22. Subrahmanyam K, Greenfield P. Online communication and adolescent relationships. Future Child. 2008 Spring;18(1):119-46. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.0.0006. PMID: 21338008.
  23. Livingstone SM, Blum-Ross A. Parenting for a digital future: How hopes and fears about technology shape children's lives. Oxford University Press,2020:261.
  24. Granic I, Morita H, Scholten H. Beyond screen time: Identity development in the digital age. Psychological inquiry. 2020. 31(3): 195-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1820214.
  25. Soldatova GU, Rasskazova EI, Nestik TA. Digital generation of Russia: competence and security. Moscow: Smysl, 2018:375 (in Russian).