Efficiency and comparative results of using psychotechnological methods of psychocorrection ‒ gaudiumotherapy and gelototherapy

 

Authors

 

Skutin A.V.

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “Ural State University of Physical Culture”, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Gromov V.A.

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “South Ural State Humanitarian and Pedagogical University”, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Shaikhetdinov R.G.

Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education “South Ural State University (national research university)”, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

Moroz I.N.

State Budgetary Healthcare Institution “Regional Clinical Specialized Psychoneurological Hospital no. 1”, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation

 

https://doi.org/10.26617/1810-3111-2024-2(123)-75-85

 

Journal: Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2024; 2 (123):  75-85.

 

Abstract

Introduction. Currently, throughout the world and in the Russian Federation, there is a steady increase in mental disorders, including nonpsychotic ones, in connection with this, the search for safe, original psychotherapeutic methods that do not require special financial costs, while at the same time having accessibility and minimal side effects, is relevant. Objective: comparative assessment of psychocorrective methods ‒ gaudiumotherapy and gelototherapy, used as part of the complex treatment of neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders. Material and Methods. The study was carried out based on the department of neuroses and borderline conditions of the Regional Clinical Specialized Psychoneurological Hospital no. 1 of Chelyabinsk in September-October 2023. The study sample included patients (n=143) aged 22-65 years with neurotic, diagnosed according to ICD-10, associated with stress and somatoform disorders (F40-F48). All patients received standard psychopharmacotherapy. The sample was divided into 2 groups of patients: group 1 (n=70) ‒ additional gelototherapy, group 2 (n=73) ‒ gaudiumotherapy. When examining patients, we used general clinical methods and a clinical-psychopathological assessment of the patients’ condition using psychometric questionnaires for quantitative and qualitative assessment of the severity of symptoms: a questionnaire for identifying and assessing neurotic symptoms (K.K. Yakhin and D.M. Mendelevich), a questionnaire of quality-of-life SF-36, a questionnaire for determining the level of neuroticism and psychopathization. Results. A positive statistically significant effect of gelototherapy and gaudiumotherapy on the mental state of patients was established. A predominant statistically significant effect of gelototherapy on the pain factor was revealed in comparison with gaudiumotherapy according to comparative data at the time of admission to the hospital and at the end of therapy: 55.4±3.6 and 38.4±2.9 points (p<0.001) vs. 46.3±4.6 and 36.5±2.1 points (p<0.01). At the same time, gaudiumotherapy had a more pronounced statistically significant effect on the leveling of neurotic depression according questionnaire by K.K. Yakhin, D.M. Mendelevich compared with gelototherapy: -4.08±5.31 and 3.68±4.50 points (p<0.001) versus -3.85±5.56 and 1.58±3.71 points (p<0 ,01). A higher statistically significant effect on reducing the level of neuroticism of gaudiumotherapy was found compared to gelototherapy: 19.65±11.47 and 38.76±21.27 points (p≤0.01) versus 25.45±13.28 and 34.73±10.49 points (p≤0.05). Conclusion. The feasibility of using gaudiumotherapy and gelototherapy in combination with psychopharmacotherapy as part of group psychotherapy (10 sessions) for patients with mental disorders has been proven.

 

Keywords: neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders, psychopharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, gelototherapy (laughter therapy), gaudiumotherapy (joy therapy).

 

Article (pdf)

 

Contacts

 

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Materials  

For citation: Skutin A.V., Gromov V.A., Shaikhetdinov R.G., Moroz I.N. Efficiency and comparative results of usingpsychotechnological methods of psychocorrection ‒ gaudiumotherapy and gelototherapy. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry.2024; 2 (123): 75-85. https://doi.org/10.26617/1810-3111-2024-2(123)-75-85

 

REFERENCES

  1. Method of psychotherapy for neurotic disorders: patent 2798720 C1 Russian Federation. AV Skutin, LA Rudov, SL Rudov, RL Rudov. No. 2022122353; application 08/17/2022; publ. 06/23/2023.
  2. McGhee P.E. Humor: its origin and development. San Francisco: Publisher W.H. Freeman & Co, 1979:251.
  3. Martin RA. Psychology of humor: translation from English. St. Petersburg: Piter Publishing House, 2009:480.
  4. Hubert W, de Jong-Meyer R. Psychophysiological response patterns to positive and negative film stimuli. Biol Psychol. 1991 Aug;31(1):73-93. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(90)90079-c. PMID: 2021681.
  5. Hubert W, Möller M, de Jong-Meyer R. Film-induced amusement changes in saliva cortisol levels. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1993;18(4):265-72. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(93)90023-e. PMID: 8316615.
  6. Foster PS, Webster DG, Williamson J. The psychophysiological differentiation of actual, imagined, and recollected mirth. Imagination, Cognition and Personality/ 2002$22(2):163-180. https://doi.org/10.2190/KL08-1P9C-K9BE-K8VA
  7. Overeem S, Taal W, Ocal Gezici E, Lammers GJ, Van Dijk JG. Is motor inhibition during laughter due to emotional or respiratory influences? Psychophysiology. 2004 Mar;41(2):254-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00145.x. PMID: 15032990.
  8. Strack F, Martin LL, Stepper S. Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: a nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 May;54(5):768-77. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.768. PMID: 3379579.
  9. Berk LS, Tan SA, Fry WF, Napier BJ, Lee JW, Hubbard RW, Lewis JE, Eby WC. Neuroendocrine and stress hormone changes during mirthful laughter. Am J Med Sci. 1989 Dec;298(6):390-6. doi: 10.1097/00000441-198912000-00006. PMID: 2556917.
  10. Skutin AV. An approximate set of exercises used in the domestic method of gelototherapy. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2011;5(68):81-85 (in Russian).
  11. Skutin AV. Gelototherapy/laughter therapy is a modern wellness technology in the practice of psychosomatic disorders (monitoring and prognosis). Chelyabinsk, 2021:224(in Russian).
  12. Skutin AV, Efimenko TS. Reader on psychotherapy and psychological training in rehabilitation medicineю. Chelyabinsk: Ural Academy, 2017:214(in Russian).
  13. Skutin AV. Modern foreign studies of the influence of humor and laughter on human health. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2011;4(67):114-119(in Russian).
  14. Skutin AV. Gelototherapy/laughter therapy in the practice of borderline mental disorders (efficacy, dynamics and prognosis). Chelyabinsk: Ural Academy, 2012:191 (in Russian).
  15. Skutin AV. Gelototherapy in the practice of borderline mental disorders: effectiveness, dynamics and prognosis. Saarbrücken: LAP LAMBERT, 2013:244(in Russian).
  16. Semke VYa, Kupriyanova IE. Psychotherapy: present and future. Tendency towards integration, Message 1 (Review of materials of the X Congress of the World Association of Psychiatrists). Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 1998;1-2:118-123(in Russian).
  17. PirogovaPV, KupriyanovaIE. Family disadaptation of patients with neurotic disorders. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2010;5(62):16–17(in Russian).
  18. Nasyrova RF, Sotnikova LS, Kupriyanova IE, Semke VA. Interdisciplinary approach to the rehabilitation of women with gynecological diseases associated with nonpsychotic mental disorders. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2010;6(63):57-59(in Russian).
  19. Bokhan TG. The role of individual psychological factors in the formation of skills for solving social problems. Siberian Psychological Journal. 2000;13:5660(in Russian).
  20. Belokrylova MF, Garganeeva NP, Aksenov MM, Lukyanova EV, Perchatkina OE, Kostin AK, Rudnitsky VA, Epanchintseva EM, Maltsev VS. Nonpsychotic mental disorders in women: age aspect. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2016;4(93):33–39(in Russian).
  21. Kostin AK, Rudnitsky VA, Aksenov MM, Belokrylova MF, Lebedeva VF, Epanchintseva EM, Ivanova AA, Nikitina VB, Perchatkina OE, Garganeeva NP, Tsybulskaya EV. Personalized psychopharmacological and cognitive behavioral therapy and rehabilitation of patients with somatoform symptoms. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2017;1(94):15-21(in Russian).
  22. Semke VYa, Kupriyanova IE, Potapkina EV, Semke VA, Kolomiets SA. Neuropsychiatric disorders in various oncological diseases (psychotherapeutic and psychopharmacological correction). Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2011;4(67):84-86(in Russian).
  23. Tyutev RA, Balashov PP, Bobrovsky AV. Cognitive-behavioral model of modification of eating behavior in the psychotherapy of excess weight. Siberian Herald of Psychiatry and Addiction Psychiatry. 2011;4(67):103-105(in Russian).
  24. Akimbekov NS, Razzaque MS. Laughter therapy: A humor-induced hormonal intervention to reduce stress and anxiety. Curr Res Physiol. 2021;4:135-138. doi: 10.1016/j.crphys.2021.04.002. Epub 2021 Apr 30. PMID: 34642668; PMCID: PMC8496883.
  25. Gelkopf M. The use of humor in serious mental illness: a review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2011;2011:342837. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nep106. Epub 2011 Jan 3. PMID: 19687190; PMCID: PMC3135316.
  26. Yim J. Therapeutic benefits of laughter in mental health: a theoretical review. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2016 Jul;239(3):243-9. doi: 10.1620/tjem.239.243. PMID: 27439375.
  27. Stiwi K, Rosendahl J. Efficacy of laughter-inducing interventions in patients with somatic or mental health problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 May;47:101552. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101552. Epub 2022 Feb 13. PMID: 35183038.